GATE COST: slope of the residual excited population per X gate (own-interval estimator unless stated) 1. Slopes per gate. Widths are first-order shot noise on the levels only; they do not resample the reference readouts. kingston day 1 (run 392) -0.00198 (shot-noise width 0.00027) kingston day 2, mean of runs 721-723 -0.00136 (shot-noise width 0.00016) fez (run 371) -0.00182 (shot-noise width 0.00028) boston read 1 (day 2) (run 711) -0.00154 (shot-noise width 0.00025) boston read 2 (day 2) (run 712) -0.00080 (shot-noise width 0.00026) boston read 3 (day 2) (run 713) -0.00063 (shot-noise width 0.00026) phoenix day 2, 3-read mean, own interval -0.00002 phoenix day 2, 3-read mean, 90 us ruler -0.00010 pittsburgh 2 Oct (run 121) -0.00107 (shot-noise width 0.00051) 2. Further slopes ibm_boston day 1 run 441 own interval -0.00139 +- 0.00026 (5.4 sigma) ibm_phoenix day 1 run 531 own interval -0.00058 +- 0.00029 (2.0 sigma) ibm_phoenix run 531 own -0.00058 90us -0.00091 one-exponential -0.00155 ibm_phoenix run 751 own -0.00032 90us -0.00019 one-exponential -0.00104 ibm_phoenix run 752 own +0.00011 90us +0.00007 one-exponential -0.00049 ibm_phoenix run 753 own +0.00015 90us -0.00017 one-exponential -0.00070 ibm_kingston run 392 own -0.00198 90us -0.00178 one-exponential -0.00104 ibm_boston run 441 own -0.00139 90us -0.00148 one-exponential -0.00139 phoenix day-2 3-read mean on the one-exponential ruler: -0.00074 3. Sign of the slope across estimators, reads and heavy-hex chips fez, kingston, boston: 9 of 9 runs negative on all 3 rulers; 9 of 9 also negative on mean, median and 20%-trim over qubits fez, kingston, boston and aachen (3 reads): 11 of 12 runs negative on all 3 rulers; 11 of 12 also negative on mean, median and 20%-trim over qubits not negative: ibm_aachen 842 on ['r300'] single reads below 2 sigma on the own-interval ruler (shot-noise width): aachen 842 (1.7 sigma) 4. Share of individual qubits with a negative own slope ibm_fez run 371 133 qubits 70% negative (sign-test p = 0.000) ibm_kingston run 392 144 qubits 69% negative (sign-test p = 0.000) ibm_kingston run 721 147 qubits 62% negative (sign-test p = 0.005) ibm_kingston run 722 148 qubits 62% negative (sign-test p = 0.004) ibm_kingston run 723 146 qubits 60% negative (sign-test p = 0.016) ibm_boston run 441 153 qubits 63% negative (sign-test p = 0.001) ibm_boston run 711 152 qubits 68% negative (sign-test p = 0.000) ibm_boston run 712 152 qubits 58% negative (sign-test p = 0.062) ibm_boston run 713 152 qubits 59% negative (sign-test p = 0.028) ibm_aachen run 841 146 qubits 62% negative (sign-test p = 0.004) ibm_aachen run 842 147 qubits 54% negative (sign-test p = 0.410) ibm_aachen run 843 147 qubits 62% negative (sign-test p = 0.005) ibm_phoenix run 531 116 qubits 54% negative (sign-test p = 0.403) ibm_phoenix run 751 116 qubits 57% negative (sign-test p = 0.163) ibm_phoenix run 752 116 qubits 51% negative (sign-test p = 0.926) ibm_phoenix run 753 116 qubits 46% negative (sign-test p = 0.403) range over fez, kingston, boston: 58-70 %; over all heavy-hex runs incl. aachen: 54-70 % phoenix runs fall at 46-57 %