######## FIXED 1/2 fit ########

== ibm_kingston: runs kingston_run1, kingston_run2, kingston_fresh
  WITHIN kingston_run1    copy vs copy (delivered T2): +1.00 [+1.00, +1.00]  n=153 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.13 [-0.29, +0.04]
  WITHIN kingston_run2    copy vs copy (delivered T2): +1.00 [+1.00, +1.00]  n=153 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.25 [-0.40, -0.09]
  WITHIN kingston_fresh   copy vs copy (delivered T2): +1.00 [+0.99, +1.00]  n=153 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.22 [-0.37, -0.05]
  BETWEEN kingston_run1 vs kingston_run2: delivered T2 +0.95 [+0.91, +0.98] | ratio +0.81 [+0.72, +0.88]  n=153
  BETWEEN kingston_run1 vs kingston_fresh: delivered T2 +0.81 [+0.70, +0.89] | ratio +0.06 [-0.11, +0.23]  n=153
  BETWEEN kingston_run2 vs kingston_fresh: delivered T2 +0.83 [+0.72, +0.91] | ratio +0.02 [-0.15, +0.19]  n=153
  BELOW-ALL: 50 of 153 qubits below stated in every run; 33.4 expected if runs were independent

== ibm_marrakesh: runs marrakesh_run1, marrakesh_run2
  WITHIN marrakesh_run1   copy vs copy (delivered T2): +1.00 [+0.99, +1.00]  n=153 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.43 [-0.56, -0.29]
  WITHIN marrakesh_run2   copy vs copy (delivered T2): +1.00 [+0.99, +1.00]  n=153 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.35 [-0.48, -0.20]
  BETWEEN marrakesh_run1 vs marrakesh_run2: delivered T2 +0.91 [+0.86, +0.94] | ratio +0.76 [+0.66, +0.84]  n=153
  BELOW-ALL: 74 of 153 qubits below stated in every run; 48.3 expected if runs were independent

== ibm_fez: runs fez_run1, fez_run2, fez_clock1, fez_clock2
  WITHIN fez_run1         copy vs copy (delivered T2): +1.00 [+0.99, +1.00]  n=154 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.08 [-0.25, +0.07]
  WITHIN fez_run2         copy vs copy (delivered T2): +1.00 [+0.99, +1.00]  n=154 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.09 [-0.24, +0.06]
  WITHIN fez_clock1       copy vs copy (delivered T2): +1.00 [+0.99, +1.00]  n=154 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.09 [-0.25, +0.08]
  WITHIN fez_clock2       copy vs copy (delivered T2): +0.99 [+0.99, +1.00]  n=154 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.08 [-0.25, +0.08]
  BETWEEN fez_run1 vs fez_run2: delivered T2 +0.93 [+0.88, +0.96] | ratio +0.86 [+0.79, +0.91]  n=154
  BETWEEN fez_run1 vs fez_clock1: delivered T2 +0.87 [+0.80, +0.92] | ratio +0.64 [+0.51, +0.74]  n=154
  BETWEEN fez_run1 vs fez_clock2: delivered T2 +0.83 [+0.73, +0.91] | ratio +0.58 [+0.44, +0.70]  n=154
  BETWEEN fez_run2 vs fez_clock1: delivered T2 +0.85 [+0.78, +0.91] | ratio +0.56 [+0.42, +0.67]  n=154
  BETWEEN fez_run2 vs fez_clock2: delivered T2 +0.83 [+0.72, +0.91] | ratio +0.57 [+0.42, +0.69]  n=154
  BETWEEN fez_clock1 vs fez_clock2: delivered T2 +0.83 [+0.72, +0.90] | ratio +0.62 [+0.48, +0.74]  n=154
  BELOW-ALL: 38 of 154 qubits below stated in every run; 7.4 expected if runs were independent

######## FREE asymptote fit ########

== ibm_kingston: runs kingston_run1, kingston_run2, kingston_fresh
  WITHIN kingston_run1    copy vs copy (delivered T2): +0.99 [+0.98, +0.99]  n=152 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.16 [-0.33, +0.01]
  WITHIN kingston_run2    copy vs copy (delivered T2): +0.99 [+0.98, +0.99]  n=152 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.22 [-0.38, -0.05]
  WITHIN kingston_fresh   copy vs copy (delivered T2): +0.98 [+0.96, +0.98]  n=153 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.16 [-0.32, -0.00]
  BETWEEN kingston_run1 vs kingston_run2: delivered T2 +0.95 [+0.92, +0.97] | ratio +0.78 [+0.68, +0.86]  n=152
  BETWEEN kingston_run1 vs kingston_fresh: delivered T2 +0.80 [+0.70, +0.88] | ratio +0.03 [-0.14, +0.19]  n=152
  BETWEEN kingston_run2 vs kingston_fresh: delivered T2 +0.80 [+0.70, +0.88] | ratio +0.00 [-0.16, +0.17]  n=152
  BELOW-ALL: 43 of 152 qubits below stated in every run; 32.1 expected if runs were independent

== ibm_marrakesh: runs marrakesh_run1, marrakesh_run2
  WITHIN marrakesh_run1   copy vs copy (delivered T2): +0.99 [+0.98, +0.99]  n=153 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.44 [-0.56, -0.30]
  WITHIN marrakesh_run2   copy vs copy (delivered T2): +0.99 [+0.98, +0.99]  n=152 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.41 [-0.53, -0.28]
  BETWEEN marrakesh_run1 vs marrakesh_run2: delivered T2 +0.89 [+0.84, +0.93] | ratio +0.76 [+0.65, +0.84]  n=152
  BELOW-ALL: 84 of 152 qubits below stated in every run; 62.5 expected if runs were independent

== ibm_fez: runs fez_run1, fez_run2, fez_clock1, fez_clock2
  WITHIN fez_run1         copy vs copy (delivered T2): +0.98 [+0.97, +0.99]  n=153 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.19 [-0.35, -0.03]
  WITHIN fez_run2         copy vs copy (delivered T2): +0.99 [+0.97, +0.99]  n=153 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.19 [-0.34, -0.04]
  WITHIN fez_clock1       copy vs copy (delivered T2): +0.98 [+0.96, +0.99]  n=154 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.15 [-0.30, +0.00]
  WITHIN fez_clock2       copy vs copy (delivered T2): +0.98 [+0.96, +0.99]  n=153 | TRAP ratio vs stated: -0.12 [-0.29, +0.05]
  BETWEEN fez_run1 vs fez_run2: delivered T2 +0.92 [+0.88, +0.95] | ratio +0.82 [+0.74, +0.87]  n=153
  BETWEEN fez_run1 vs fez_clock1: delivered T2 +0.86 [+0.80, +0.91] | ratio +0.59 [+0.45, +0.70]  n=153
  BETWEEN fez_run1 vs fez_clock2: delivered T2 +0.84 [+0.76, +0.89] | ratio +0.50 [+0.34, +0.62]  n=152
  BETWEEN fez_run2 vs fez_clock1: delivered T2 +0.84 [+0.76, +0.89] | ratio +0.51 [+0.36, +0.63]  n=153
  BETWEEN fez_run2 vs fez_clock2: delivered T2 +0.84 [+0.76, +0.90] | ratio +0.53 [+0.39, +0.65]  n=151
  BETWEEN fez_clock1 vs fez_clock2: delivered T2 +0.85 [+0.77, +0.90] | ratio +0.61 [+0.47, +0.72]  n=152
  BELOW-ALL: 43 of 151 qubits below stated in every run; 11.8 expected if runs were independent